Climate Shock, How Can This Be!

A recent analysis of peer-reviewed scientific literature (revered by the warmistas for its consensus against humanity for the recent warming trend) brought to light, over 500 scientists that have been publishing data that flies in the face of the media fueled hysteria that humans are to blame for all the fluctuations in recent temperatures.

The reports by these scientists come to two basic conclusions that a)a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that b) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun’s radiance.

Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery had this to say of the recent report findings:

“This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850.”

Regardless of publication in journals such as Science, Nature and Geophysical Review Letters there is no surprise that any of this has gotten basically ZERO media coverage.

Agenda anyone?

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

I love science, but the only formal training and study I’ve had in it have been in the computer sciences and engineering. That said… I talked about the sun fluctuating output wise when I was in highschool. I’m no genius either. It bothers me in the extreme that the popular panic frenzy carries so much more weight than real research and insight.

Also reading the term “warmistas” made me laugh out loud.

Well it IS an activist managed front so it fit perfectly.

I’ve seen several data sets that show an 800 year lag in CO2 vs Temperature and an almost PERFECT match between Solar Activity and Temperature.

As Al Gore has stated OVER AND OVER again “If there is MORE CO2 in the atmosphere, the Earth gets warmer.”

If that were true, then there wouldn’t be a lag where temp leads CO2.

So much for the liberals’ precious “consensus.” Furthermore, this is more proof that neither our understanding of natural processes or of our impact on the environment is absolute - no matter what the media (including Fox News, who have been pimping global warming as much as everyone else) or Al Gore tell you.

Once again, this is not about living a “green,” clean, minimally impactful life and doing your part to make sure we have healthy air to breathe and water to drink.

It is about a handful of liberal politicians around the world who have found a new way to force socialist reforms and limit capitalism. The movement, my friends, is more dangerous than the so-called “crisis.”

Kinda like the old adage “The cure is worse than the disease” :)

Go ahead, live off bean sprouts and wheat grass, but keep your chlorophyll stained fingers off my life.

Oh yean Casey, so much for the consensus! You do realize this is junk science, right? James, how does it feel to bandy discredited studies about to justify the hope that one day you’ll someday be a rich coal tycoon.

Damn, the secret is out… I’m in bed with the oil and coal industry!

I had better return all these checks for $0 before I get busted.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. For further information please see my Comments Policy.